These two are not far away from being finished:
These two I've just started:
Here's a simple statement of the facts:
Here's some background material:
And here's what we have to deal with:
I also got marks back for my essay and presentation for critical studies. The best comment was:
One aspect which needed work was your engagement with critical theory – your ideas are all really good but I felt you needed to back some of your critiques up. For instance – your discussion of the instiitution of art was good but completely unsupported and there are many writers you could have used to back these ideas up.
10 comments:
Unsupported ideas. Oh, you mean original ideas?
and i got :
"i do sypathise with your views but it reads more like a manifesto than a critically balanced essay" (oh and i got a D).
and i got :
"i do sypathise with your views but it reads more like a manifesto than a critically balanced essay" (oh and i got a D).
Stink! That's pretty harsh.
Why is it necessary to refer to "the literature" to support what it is you want to say?
Seems very institutionalised.
Chuckle! One would think you are in an institution. Oh, wait a second...
Institutional Best Practise??
You should do a "Traffic Women of Pyoungyang" series.
Your ideas are really good, but unworthy of consideration unless they coincide with the those of somebody who is older than you and|or has a book deal.
Now, now, as another tutor said to me, 'Cynicism leads to suicide.'
Post a Comment